AM1172 (a hydrolysis-resistant endocannabinoid analog that inhibits anandamide cellular uptake) reduces the viability of the various melanoma cells, but it exerts significant cytotoxic effects on healthy cells: an in vitro study based on isobolographic analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite great advances in our understanding of the impact of cannabinoids on human organism, many of their properties still remain undetermined, including their potential antineoplastic effects. This study was designed to assess the anti-proliferative and cytotoxic effects of AM1172 (a hydrolysis-resistant endocannabinoid analog that inhibits anandamide cellular uptake) administered alone and in combinations with docetaxel (DOCX), paclitaxel (PACX), mitoxantrone (MTX) and cisplatin (CDDP) on various human malignant melanoma A375, FM55P, SK-MEL 28 and FM55M2 cell lines. MATERIALS: In the MTT, LDH, and BrdU assays, the potency and safety of AM1172 when administered alone and in combinations with DOCX, PACX, MTX, and CDDP were determined. RESULTS: The isobolographic analysis revealed that combinations of AM1172 with PACX, DOCX, MTX, and CDDP exerted additive interactions, except for a combination of AM1172 with PACX in primary melanoma A375 cell line, for which synergy was observed (*p<0.05). Nevertheless, AM1172 when administered alone produced cytotoxic effects on healthy human melanocytes (HEMa-LP) and human keratinocytes (HaCaT), which unfortunately limits its potential therapeutic utility. CONCLUSIONS: AM1172 cannot be used separately as a chemotherapeutic drug, but it can be combined with PACX, DOCX, MTX, and CDDP, offering additive interactions in terms of the anti-proliferative effects in various malignant melanoma cell lines.

Daphnetin, a Coumarin with Anticancer Potential against Human Melanoma: In Vitro Study of Its Effective Combination with Selected Cytostatic Drugs.

(1) The treatment of metastatic or drug-resistant melanoma is still a significant therapeutic problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anticancer potential of daphnetin (7,8-dihydroxycoumarin) and its combinations with five different cytostatic drugs (mitoxantrone, docetaxel, vemurafenib, epirubicin and cisplatin). (2) The viability, proliferation and cytotoxicity of daphnetin against four human malignant melanoma cell lines were evaluated. The interactions were assessed using isobolographic analysis for the combinations of daphnetin with each of the five cytostatic drugs. (3) Daphnetin showed anticancer activity against malignant melanoma, with IC50 values ranging from 40.48 ± 10.90 µM to 183.97 ± 18.82 µM, depending on the cell line. The combination of daphnetin with either vemurafenib or epirubicin showed an antagonistic interaction. Moreover, additive interactions were observed for the combinations of daphnetin with cisplatin and docetaxel. The most desirable synergistic interactions for human melanoma metastatic cell lines were observed for the combination of daphnetin with mitoxantrone. (4) The obtained results suggest that daphnetin should not be combined with vemurafenib or epirubicin in the treatment of malignant melanoma due to the abolition of their anticancer effects. The combination of daphnetin with mitoxantrone is beneficial in the treatment of metastatic melanoma due to their synergistic interaction.

Synergy, Additivity and Antagonism between Esculetin and Six Commonly Used Chemotherapeutics in Various Malignant Melanoma Cell Lines-An Isobolographic Analysis.

(1) Malignant melanomas are dangerous skin cancers, and the treatment of melanomas with various cytostatic drugs often causes side effects and after their prolonged use resistance to these drugs appears. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anticancer effects of esculetin (a simple coumarin) and to assess pharmacodynamic interactions between esculetin and six commonly used cytostatic drugs (cisplatin, epirubicin, docetaxel, paclitaxel, mitoxantrone and vemurafenib) using an isobolographic analysis. (2) The experiments were carried out on four human malignant melanoma cell lines (FM55P, A375, FM55M2 and SK-MEL28). The effects of esculetin on viability, cell proliferation and cytotoxicity were verified in the range of concentrations of 2-200 µM. (3) Esculetin inhibited, in a dose-dependent manner, malignant melanoma cell viability and proliferation. The IC50 for esculetin ranged from 18.20 ± 2.93 to 120.64 ± 30.39 µM depending on the melanoma cell lines used. The combinations of esculetin with epirubicin and vemurafenib showed antagonistic interactions, the combinations of esculetin with cisplatin, docetaxel and paclitaxel showed additive interactions. For the combinations of esculetin with mitoxantrone, the isobolographic analysis displayed synergy. (4) In the treatment of malignant melanoma, esculetin should not be combined with epirubicin or vemurafenib, due to the reduction of their anticancer effects, while the synergistic interactions (esculetin + mitoxantrone) deserve a preclinical recommendation as a beneficial combination during anticancer therapy.

Antiseizure Effects of Scoparone, Borneol and Their Impact on the Anticonvulsant Potency of Four Classic Antiseizure Medications in the Mouse MES Model-An Isobolographic Transformation.

Numerous botanical drugs containing coumarins and terpenes are used in ethnomedicine all over the world for their various therapeutic properties, especially those affecting the CNS system. The treatment of epilepsy is based on antiseizure medications (ASMs), although novel strategies using naturally occurring substances with confirmed antiseizure properties are being developed nowadays. The aim of this study was to determine the anticonvulsant profiles of scoparone (a simple coumarin) and borneol (a bicyclic monoterpenoid) when administered separately and in combination, as well as their impact on the antiseizure effects of four classic ASMs (carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital and valproate) in the mouse model of maximal electroshock-induced (MES) tonic-clonic seizures. MES-induced seizures were evoked in mice receiving the respective doses of the tested natural compounds and classic ASMs (when applied alone or in combinations). Interactions for two-drug and three-drug mixtures were assessed by means of isobolographic transformation of data. Polygonograms were used to illustrate the types of interactions occurring among drugs. The total brain content of ASMs was measured in mice receiving the respective drug treatments with fluorescent polarization immunoassay. Scoparone and borneol, when administered alone, exerted anticonvulsant properties in the mouse MES model. The two-drug mixtures of scoparone with valproate, borneol with phenobarbital and borneol with valproate produced synergistic interactions in the mouse MES model, while the remaining tested two-drug mixtures produced additivity. The three-drug mixtures of scoparone + borneol with valproate and phenobarbital produced synergistic interactions in the mouse MES model. Verification of total brain concentrations of valproate and phenobarbital revealed that borneol elevated the total brain concentrations of both ASMs, while scoparone did not affect the brain content of these ASMs in mice. The synergistic interaction of scoparone with valproate observed in the mouse MES model is pharmacodynamic in nature. Borneol elevated the brain concentrations of the tested ASMs, contributing to the pharmacokinetic nature of the observed synergistic interactions with valproate and phenobarbital in the mouse MES model.

Comparison of the Anticancer Effects of Arvanil and Olvanil When Combined with Cisplatin and Mitoxantrone in Various Melanoma Cell Lines-An Isobolographic Analysis.

Due to the unique structures of arvanil and olvanil, the drugs combine certain properties of both cannabinoids and vanilloids, which makes them able to stimulate both TPRV1 and CB1 receptors and causes them to be interesting agents in the setting of carcinoma treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the cytotoxic and anti-proliferative effects of arvanil and olvanil when administered alone and in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) and mitoxantrone (MTX), using various primary (A375, FM55P) and metastatic (SK-MEL 28, FM55M2) human malignant melanoma cell lines. The results indicate that both arvanil and olvanil inhibited (dose-dependently) the viability and proliferation of various malignant melanoma cells, as demonstrated by MTT and BrdU assays. The safety profile of both arvanil and olvanil tested in human keratinocytes (HaCaT) and normal human melanocytes (HEMa-LP) revealed that neither arvanil nor olvanil caused significant cytotoxicity in HaCaT and HEMa-LP cell lines in LDH and MTT assays. Isobolographically, it was found that both arvanil and olvanil exerted additive interactions with MTX and antagonistic interactions with CDDP in the studied malignant melanoma cell lines. In conclusion, the combinations of arvanil or olvanil with MTX may be considered as a part of melanoma multi-drug therapy; however, the combination of these compounds with CDDP should be carefully considered due to the antagonistic interactions observed in the studied malignant melanoma cell lines.

Additive Interactions between Betulinic Acid and Two Taxanes in In Vitro Tests against Four Human Malignant Melanoma Cell Lines.

The incidence of melanoma is steadily increasing worldwide. Melanoma is the most lethal skin cancer, and new therapeutic methods are being sought. Our research aimed to investigate the cytotoxic and antiproliferative effects of betulinic acid in vitro, used alone and in combination with taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel) in four melanoma cell lines. Isobolographic analysis allowed us to assess the interactions between these compounds. Betulinic acid had no cytotoxic effect on normal human keratinocyte HaCaT cells; the amount of LDH released by them was significantly lower compared to melanoma cell lines. The present study shows that betulinic acid significantly inhibits the growth of melanoma cell lines in vitro. The IC50 values of betulinic acid ranged from 2.21 µM to 15.94 µM against the four melanoma lines. Co-treatment of betulinic acid with paclitaxel or docetaxel generated desirable drug-drug interactions, such as an additive and additive with a tendency to synergy interactions.

Fraxetin Interacts Additively with Cisplatin and Mitoxantrone, Antagonistically with Docetaxel in Various Human Melanoma Cell Lines-An Isobolographic Analysis.

Malignant melanoma is a skin cancer characterized by rapid development, poor prognosis and high mortality. Due to the frequent drug resistance and/or early metastases in melanoma, new therapeutic methods are urgently needed. The study aimed at assessing the cytotoxic and antiproliferative effects of scoparone and fraxetin in vitro, when used alone and in combination with three cytostatics: cisplatin, mitoxantrone, and docetaxel in four human melanoma cell lines. Our experiments showed that scoparone in the concentration range tested up to 200 µM had no significant effect on the viability of human malignant melanoma (therefore, it was not possible to evaluate it in combination with other cytostatics), while fraxetin inhibited cell proliferation with IC50 doses in the range of 32.42-73.16 µM, depending on the cell line. Isobolographic analysis allowed for the assessment of the interactions between the studied compounds. Importantly, fraxetin was not cytotoxic to normal keratinocytes (HaCaT) and melanocytes (HEMa-LP), although it slightly inhibited their viability at high concentrations. The combination of fraxetin with cisplatin and mitoxantrone showed the additive interaction, which seems to be a promising direction in melanoma therapy. Unfortunately, the combination of fraxetin with docetaxel may not be beneficial due to the antagonistic antiproliferative effect of both drugs used in the mixture.